AdvancePath Home
Blog Home
Blog Index
Subscribe

New Posts

Response to Intervention in the Blended Learning Environment

Sept. 22, 2015

A Guide to Common Core

Aug. 21, 2015

Three Strategies for Consistently Engaging Learners

Aug. 10, 2015

The importance of cultivating a growth mindset with students

July 15, 2015

Becoming a reflective educator

July 7, 2015

Developing prosocial behaviors and interactions within the classroom experience

June 30, 2015

Identifying at-risk learners. Two critical components

June 15, 2015

Three key factors in igniting the fire in learners

June 9, 2015

Memories of school veterans. Thank you

May 24, 2015

Keeping early course finishers engaged

May 17, 2015

The right curriculum for blended learning

May 11, 2015

Blended Learning Technology. Selection Process

April 26, 2015

Students who finish early. Four ways to keep grads-to-be engaged

April 20, 2015

Generation DIY. Benefits of blended learning that transcend instruction

March 30, 2015

Generation DIY. Benefits from the Blended Learning homefront

March 23, 2015

Top 6 Lessons from Madness. NCAA March Madness

March 16, 2015

Preventing the Dreaded: "Why Do We Need to Learn This?"

March 9, 2015

8 Blended Learning Space Considerations

March 2, 2015

5 Favorite Practices for Effective Communication

Feb. 23, 2015

Second-Order Change: The Blended Learning Mandate

Feb. 16, 2015

6 Ways to Match Blended Learning Models

Feb. 9, 2015

Using the SAMR Model in Blended Learning

Feb. 2, 2015

Planning for 1 to 1 Learning: Making the Blended Learning Model Local

Jan. 24, 2015

Eight Elite Questions to Ask When Selecting Online Content Providers

Jan. 17, 2015

Five Tips to Overcome the "January Syndrome" in Professional Development

Jan. 11, 2015

Blended education: Student-led discussions

Jan. 5, 2015

Next Generation Learning Spaces eBook offer and conference information

Dec. 9, 2014

Learning from Reality TV. Five Important Presentation Lessons for Teachers

Oct. 31, 2014

Six steps to great technology training

Oct. 27, 2014

Why I’m "Bullish" on Blended Learning

Oct. 20, 2014

Lessons from the One-Room Schoolhouse

Oct. 13, 2014

6 Keys to Deliberate Practice in Blended Learning

Oct. 6, 2014

Top Fifteen Skills Students Need for College and Career Readiness

Sept. 29, 2014

6 Ways Google Drive Docs Rocks in Blended Education

Sept. 22, 2014

Effective Instructional Probing Questions

Sept. 12, 2014

6 Career Types for Personalizing Learning

Sept. 8, 2014

Back to school thoughts

Aug. 29, 2014

Using data to inform instruction. Rigor, Relevance, and Results

Aug. 25, 2014

Teaching to Learn

Aug. 14, 2014

Social and Emotional learning matters

Aug. 9, 2014

Infographic: 7 Blended Activities to Start the New Year

Aug. 4, 2014

Tips for electrifying instruction (even when the lights go out)

Aug. 1, 2014

Lansing's Woodcreek Achievement Center: Blended Learning ideas to improve reading comprehension

July 26, 2014

Top Five Blended Learning Tweets (of the summer so far)

July 21, 2014

Infographic: 8 key points to include in digital citizenship

July 8, 2014

Deliberate practice makes remember-able perfect

July 4, 2014

The 'One Minute Manager's' advice to teachers and students

June 27, 2014

Ways to Get the Most from ISTE 2014

June 23, 2014

Educators advocate for new programs, more technology, increased funding. 3 simple steps.

June 16, 2014

7 Favorite Ways Students Like to Learn

June 9, 2014

Adapting Teacher Observations to Blended Learning Environments

June 2, 2014

Celebrating Successes. Student Learning in a Blended, Personalized Environment

May 26, 2014

Teaching in a Blended Environment: 12 Questions for Reflection and Discussion

May 19, 2014

Great ways to support teachers in blended, personalized, and online learning classrooms

May 12, 2014

Engagement doesn't necessarily equal buy-in. Working through pushback in Blended Learning environments

May 5, 2014

Connecting Classroom Instruction to Online Content

April 28, 2014

Blended Learning Classrooms Start with Blended Learning Professional Development

April 21, 2014

Top 3 Ways Blended Learning Really Works in Professional Development

April 14, 2014

Must Follow Organizations Supporting Blended, Personalized Learning

April 7, 2014

Great Probes for Blended, Personalized, Online Teaching

March 31, 2014

Four Key Considerations for Selecting Blended, Personalized, and Online Learning Tools

March 24, 2014

Four Creative Ways to Share the Vision for Blended, Personalized, Online Learning

March 17, 2014

Series: Planning for Blended and Personalized Learning: Blended Learning Goals

March 10, 2014

Planning for Blended and Personalized Learning Series: Crafting a Vision

March 3, 2014

News from the Field: eLearn Magazine – Call for K12 Blended Learning Articles

Feb. 24, 2014

Does Big Bird "Tweet"? Teaching Generation Z

Feb. 17, 2014

Five Characteristics of Great Blended Learning Teachers

Feb. 10, 2014

Empowering Students with the Top Four Blended Learning Models

Feb. 5, 2014

Three Interrelated Parts of Real Blended Learning

Jan. 28, 2014
A Guide to Common Core
Tweet
Aug. 21, 2015
Tags: charmain carter, ccss, common core, understanding common core, alignment, common core initiative
1 Comment

-- Posted by AdvancePath Educational Consultant and blogger, Charmain L. Carter

As we continue preparation for return to school, parents, students and educators have many questions about Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and its implementation, locally and nationally. Lately, there seems to be more questions than answers regarding CCSS implementation and testing the Standards. Some of the most common questions that we will address in this post are: What is Common Core and how will it ensure rigorous and high academic achievement for students?" Why are the changes happening now and what impact will they have on state standardized testing? What is the difference between standards states already have in place and the Common Core State Standards? Are the standards mandatory or can each school district select to participate? Will Districts have control over curriculum?

In order to get a better understanding of Common Core, let's start by focusing on its bold and concerted beginning. The Common Core State Standards Initiative was an educational initiative that detailed what K–12 students should know in English language arts and mathematics at the end of each grade. The initiative is sponsored by the National Governors Association (NGA) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) and sought to establish consistent educational standards across the states and to ensure that students graduating from high school were provided with the skills and knowledge needed to succeed in college and careers. States chose whether to adopt the Common Core State Standards Initiative. Initially, forty-four of the fifty U.S. states and the District of Columbia were members of the Common Core State Standards Initiative. Adoption was not required by the federal government, but those states that did adopt the standards received various incentives. Several states that initially adopted Common Core have since voted to repeal or replace it. Other states elected to overhaul their state standards but did not adopt the Common Core State Standards Initiative.*

One of the biggest misnomers about Common Core involves whether it is in itself a curriculum. Common Core is not a curriculum. The standards outline what students should know and be able to do at each grade level. They are defined more as “goals.” The Standards do not dictate any particular pedagogy or what order topics should be taught within a particular grade level. Curriculum is how teachers teach each day (instructional and learning strategies) and in what order. For instance, several different teachers in different states might each use different instructional strategies and teach in a different order the same standard in the first mathematical practice of “making sense of problems and persevere in solving them.” The students will work toward the same goal, but using different instructional strategies, which are generally outlined at the state or district level.

Previous standards focused on how to perform tasks, such as addition and subtraction and memorizing information, whereas Common Core focuses more on critical thinking and problem solving, without eliminating skill building. There are fewer, clearer and higher standards which are intended to help students understand the “why” behind what they learn. In English language arts Common Core focus is on more complex text and academic language. Students perform tasks in reading, writing and speaking grounded in evidence from text. As student’s progress into higher grades the emphasis shifts to more non-fiction text and persuasive and technical writing in order to prepare them for college and career readiness. The Common Core goal of the mathematics standards is to achieve greater focus and coherence in the curriculum. It highlights greater focus on fewer topics. Coherence, linking topics and thinking, within and across grades is critical. The Standards mandate that eight principles of mathematical practice be taught.

The AdvancePath Model supports CCSS by focusing on the capacity of learners, with data driven decision-making and increased student engagement. Along with our district curriculum partners, the AdvancePath Model provides specific and clear teaching and learning strategies, with interventions and support for students at all levels of academic readiness.

*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Core_State_Standards_Initiative

comments
Cynthia Rogers
Aug. 21, 2015, 2:25 p.m.
Your explanation of CCSS misnomers, history, and empathy in description for many who have conflated curriculum and standards is perfect. CCSS' are not Curricula and "...They are defined more as goals. The Standards do not dictate any particular pedagogy or what order topics should be taught within a particular grade level." Yes! CCSS "equals" an attempt to standardize education across these Great United States of America. Teachers, then, are empowered to develop instruction that is personalized, differentiated, for each student including Resiliency and empowering Students to take charge of their learning process. Moreover, when families relocate across states - districts - grade level expectations would be the same. (If implemented at its true purpose) Makes sense for sure. The AdvancePath Model has kept pace with CCSS and its initiatives alongside "never-ending-research/development." Thank You!

Follow AdvancePath on Twitter